Drake’s decision to appeal the dismissal of his lawsuit against Universal Music Group marks the next phase in one of hip-hop’s most high-profile legal feuds. His claim — that UMG artificially boosted streams of Kendrick Lamar’s “Not Like Us” to damage his brand — raised questions about corporate interference in rap rivalries.
Judge Jeannette Vargas dismissed the case earlier this month, reasoning that Lamar’s lyrics were hyperbolic and part of a traditional diss exchange. Her ruling emphasized context: rap battles, by nature, rely on exaggerated claims not meant to be interpreted literally.
Still, Drake’s legal team appears undeterred. Their appeal will likely focus on whether the judge erred in applying artistic context too broadly. Legal experts say the case could test the boundaries between free speech, defamation, and competitive artistry.
UMG, meanwhile, maintains the lawsuit was frivolous. “This suit was an affront to creative expression,” the label stated.
As the appeal moves forward, the music world watches closely — not just for the verdict, but for what it may signal about future battles between artists and corporations that profit from them.
